Tactical
Stop Listing Adjectives: Prove Your Brand Personality in Action
"If you have to claim you're approachable, you probably haven't shown it yet."
Open the About page of almost any design studio and you will find the same short list. Approachable. Professional. Creative. Collaborative. Detail-oriented.
Every word on it may be true, and that is the trouble. The words are true of nearly every designer a prospect will consider, so they do no work. A homeowner comparing three studios reads the same five adjectives three times and learns nothing about any of them.
Personality is one of the strongest reasons a client picks one designer over another. It only counts when they can see it.
The adjective pile that says nothing
The pile builds up for an understandable reason. At some point you sat down to describe your studio, asked yourself what you are like to work with, and wrote down honest answers. You are approachable. You are careful with details. Nothing on the list is a lie.
Now read it the way a stranger does. A prospect has no way to check an adjective. “Detail-oriented” costs nothing to type, and the designer who loses fabric samples and misses install dates can type it too. So the reader does the sensible thing and skims past.
There is a second problem. The words most designers reach for are the ones nobody would ever claim the opposite of. No studio describes itself as cold, sloppy, and hard to reach. When the opposite of a claim is absurd, the claim tells the reader nothing. That is a large part of why so many designers end up sounding like everyone else.
Here is a simple test for any line about yourself. If the reader has to take your word for it, the line is weak. If the reader can picture it happening, the line is strong.
Claimed vs. proven: the difference a prospect can feel
A claimed trait asks for trust. A proven trait hands over evidence.
Compare two lines from two studios that both think of themselves as approachable.
The first says, “We pride ourselves on being approachable and easy to work with.”
The second says, “You will have my cell number from day one. Text me a photo of the lamp you are not sure about, and you will hear back the same day.”
The second line never uses the word. A prospect reads it and thinks, “She sounds easy to reach.” They arrived at the adjective by themselves, and a conclusion people reach on their own is one they believe.
If you have to claim you’re approachable, you probably haven’t shown it yet.
The first line also sounds like every other studio. The second could only have been written by a designer who really does hand out her cell number. That is the feeling a prospect picks up on, even when they could not tell you why one studio felt more real than the other.
The drill: trait, behavior, proof, benefit
This is the exercise we run in The Brand Lab when a designer brings in a list of personality words. Take one trait at a time and walk it through four steps on paper.
Trait. Write the word down. Approachable, calm, exacting, whatever is on your list.
Behavior. Name something you do that a client could watch. It has to be specific enough to film. “I care about my clients” cannot be filmed. “I walk the finished room with every client and a roll of blue tape, and we mark anything that is not right” can.
Proof. Find the evidence that the behavior really happens. A photo, a line from a past client, a document you send, a habit you have kept for years.
Benefit. Say what the client gets out of it. This is the step designers skip most, and it is the one the prospect cares about. A behavior with no benefit is a fun fact about you.
When all four are filled in, you have a line of copy that no other studio can borrow. When you get stuck at the second step, you have learned something more useful, which we will come back to.
Three composite examples turning a trait into evidence
These are composites, built from patterns I see often. They are not real studios.
Detail-oriented. A designer writes that she is “obsessed with the details.” Run through the drill, the behavior turns out to be that she tapes the footprint of every large piece onto the floor before anything is ordered, then walks the room with the client. The proof is a photo of a living room covered in tape outlines. The benefit is that the sofa that shows up fits, and nothing goes back. Her new line reads, “Before we order a single piece, we tape its outline on your floor and walk the room together, so what arrives fits the first time.”
Collaborative. Another designer uses the word on every page. Her behavior is that she brings two full concept directions to the first presentation and hands the client a marker. The proof is a photo of a concept board covered in a client’s notes. The benefit is that the finished home feels like theirs. “You will see two directions and a marker. Write on the boards. The room we build comes out of what you circle.”
Calm. A third designer wants clients to know she keeps projects steady. Her behavior is one email every Friday that says what happened this week, what happens next week, and what she needs from the client. The proof is a past client’s comment about never having to chase her for an update. The benefit is that the client stops lying awake wondering where the tile is. “Every Friday you get one email with where things stand. You will never have to ask.”
In all three, the adjective is gone from the finished line. The reader supplies it.
Where proven personality shows up (copy, onboarding, the small moments)
Once you have run the drill on three to five traits, the results belong in more places than your About page.
In your copy, each trait becomes a sentence about what you do. Service pages, your process page, and your proposals all have room for one.
In your onboarding, the behaviors become the experience itself. If one of your traits is warmth, the welcome email is where a new client first finds out whether that was true. If one is precision, the first document you send had better be free of typos.
The small moments carry the most weight. How fast you reply. What your voicemail says. The note on an invoice. How you break the news about a backordered chair. A client forgets most of your website within a week of signing. They remember how you sounded on the day something went wrong.
Personality is one of the inputs of your positioning, and it is the one clients feel most directly. If you want the wider picture of how it fits with the rest, start with what brand positioning is.
Authentic vs. aspirational: only claim what you actually do
Run the drill honestly and some of your traits will stall at step two. You wrote “playful,” and you cannot name one playful thing you do with a client.
That trait is aspirational. It describes the studio you would like to be. There is nothing wrong with wanting it, and you have two honest choices. Start doing the thing, keep doing it until you have proof, and claim it then. Or take the word off the list.
What you cannot do is leave it in your marketing. A client meets the claim first and the real experience second. If the website promised warm and the project felt brisk, the client reads that gap as a broken promise.
The traits that survive may not be ones everybody likes, and that is fine. A designer who is decisive and opinionated will put some prospects off and draw others in fast. A proven trait works as a filter, and a filter is what you want.
Those surviving traits are also raw material for your Only Statement. A differentiator has the same requirement a trait does. A prospect has to be able to see it.
What to change this week
Three steps, each small enough to finish in a sitting.
First, pull every personality adjective off your About page and your Instagram bio and put them in one list. Cross out any word a competitor down the road could claim without changing a letter. Most of the list will go.
Second, pick the three traits you would fight for and run each through the drill. Trait, behavior, proof, benefit. If one stalls at behavior, set it aside and choose another.
Third, rewrite one paragraph of your About page using the behaviors, with the adjectives left out. Then send it to a past client and ask what three words they would use to describe working with you. If their words match the traits you started with, the paragraph is doing its job.
You already have a personality, and your best clients already know it. The work is getting it onto the page where a stranger can see it too.
If your brand is a list of adjectives, let’s make it something clients can see. The Brand Lab turns your personality and the rest of your positioning into proof a prospect can check. Five spots a month.
What is brand personality for an interior designer?
How many brand personality traits should a design studio have?
How do I show brand personality without listing adjectives?
What is the difference between an authentic and an aspirational brand trait?
Long-form thinking, every week.
Positioning, pricing, and brand strategy for interior designers. From the studio that runs The Brand Lab. Unsubscribe anytime.