Pricing

How Interior Designers Can Charge More (Without Losing Clients)

"Most pricing problems aren't pricing problems. They're positioning problems pretending to be pricing problems."

Jon Czeranna
Jon CzerannaCo-Founder, Wit & Craft
April 24, 2026 6 min read

Almost every interior designer we meet inside The Brand Lab walks in with the same problem statement.

I know I should be charging more.

The story underneath that statement is almost always the same too. They quote a number that feels reasonable for the scope. The prospect winces. The designer drops the rate by 15 to 25 percent to close the deal. They take the project. They resent it for the next four months.

This is not a pricing strategy. This is the slow erosion of your business.

The reason it keeps happening isn’t that your fees are wrong. The reason is that your fees are the only thing the prospect can compare. When the only legible variable is price, the negotiation is inevitable.

Here’s the actual fix.

The trap of competing on price

Every service business eventually meets the same fork in the road. You can compete on price, or you can compete on value. The catch: those are not symmetrical choices.

If you compete on price, the only way to defend your position is to keep being the cheapest. That’s a race you have to win every quarter, against every new entrant, forever.

If you compete on value, the question becomes whether the prospect understands the value before the price comes up. If they do, the fee feels obvious. If they don’t, you’re back to negotiating.

Almost every designer who feels stuck on pricing is actually stuck on the part that comes before pricing. The market doesn’t yet have a way to compare them on anything other than the number on the proposal.

That’s the problem worth solving. Not the price.

Why your positioning sets your ceiling

Pricing power is downstream of positioning clarity.

Watch what happens when a designer’s positioning gets sharp. The prospect arrives at the first call having read the website. They already know who the firm is for. They already know what makes the process unusual. They already know what the firm refuses to do.

By the time the price gets named, the conversation has already happened. The fee is legible because the value is legible. Of course it costs that, given everything I just read.

Watch the inverse. A designer with vague positioning quotes a number. The prospect has no frame for what’s being charged for. The number sounds like a number, not the cost of a specific outcome. Negotiation follows.

This is why we tell designers, before any pricing conversation: fix the positioning first. Once the positioning is clear, the pricing conversation becomes 80 percent easier. Without it, no pricing strategy will hold.

If positioning is the work you haven’t done yet, start there and come back.

The five shifts that let designers raise rates

Once positioning is in place, five practical shifts move designers off the bottom of the market.

Shift 1. Move from hourly to flat fee or percentage

Hourly fees teach clients to value your time, not your outcomes. They also create an artificial ceiling. The moment a client thinks that designer’s hourly rate is X, they stop seeing you as someone who solves a $500K renovation problem and start seeing you as someone whose rate is X.

Flat fees and percentage-of-project arrangements make the value the unit. The client is buying a finished, designed home, not three months of your hours.

The transition feels risky. It almost never costs you a project that was going to be good anyway. It almost always raises the fee on the projects you do book.

Shift 2. Charge for the strategy work, separately

Most designers throw the strategic part of their work in for free. Discovery calls, ICP meetings, vision sessions, references, vendor coordination strategy. They wrap it all into “design fee.”

The work that defines the project is the work that should command the most respect, not the least. A separate strategy or discovery phase, billed up front, does several things at once. It makes the strategic depth visible. It filters out clients who only want a renderings-and-finishes service. It reframes the engagement as a partnership instead of a transaction.

Designers who add this phase typically charge $5K to $25K for it, depending on their market and project type. It nearly always pays for itself in better-fit clients and tighter projects on the design phase that follows.

Shift 3. Stop unbundling

Cheap competitors win by unbundling. We can do just the kitchen. We can do just the FF&E. We can do this without architectural input.

When you compete in the unbundled lane, you compete on cost-per-line-item. That race goes nowhere good.

The premium move is the opposite. We don’t take partial-room engagements. We don’t take projects without architectural collaboration. We do whole-home, end-to-end, or we don’t do it.

The first reaction is fear: I’ll lose work. You’ll lose some work. Specifically, the work that was teaching your clients to compare you on the cost of small pieces. The work you keep gets bigger, longer, and more profitable.

Shift 4. Make the fee structure obvious before the proposal

The proposal is too late to start educating the client about your fees.

The websites that convert at premium fees do something most designer sites don’t: they tell the prospect what the engagement looks like and roughly what it costs, before the discovery call. Not exact numbers. Ranges. Whole-home engagements typically run $X to $Y in fees. Our smallest engagement is $Z.

This does two things. It pre-qualifies the inquiries that come in (the ones who reach out know roughly what they’re walking into). And it normalizes the number, so when the precise figure shows up in the proposal, it isn’t a surprise.

Designers afraid to put numbers on their site are usually using the absence as a way to keep options open. The cost of that flexibility is that you negotiate every project, in real time, with strangers.

Shift 5. Raise the floor and accept the consequences

The hardest move, and the most powerful.

Pick a number under which you will not work. Not a soft preference. A hard floor.

Then communicate it. Put it on the contact form. Mention it on the discovery call before discussing scope. Make it impossible for a project below the floor to even reach the proposal phase.

Two things happen. The volume of inquiries drops. The quality of inquiries climbs. The math, for almost every designer who tries it, comes out ahead within the first year.

The mistake most designers make here is setting a soft floor. We usually start around $40K, but we can sometimes work with smaller scopes. That sentence is read by clients as please negotiate with me. A hard floor doesn’t have an apology in it. It’s the floor.

The case study that makes this concrete

Inside the program, this is the shape of the transformation we see most often.

Dru Chapman of Studio Chapman came in knowing her work was strong and her fees should reflect that. The whole reason she was there was that the fees weren’t reflecting it. She was fighting for them on every project.

What changed during the program wasn’t her pricing strategy. It was her positioning. By the end, she had a Strategic Positioning Document, an Only Statement, and a clear ICP. The first place this showed up wasn’t her website. It was her sales conversations.

Inside the program, before she had even completed it, she landed a top-tier client at premium pricing. The client didn’t push back on the fee. The fee made sense to them, because the positioning had already done the work the proposal usually has to do.

That’s the pattern. Position first. Pricing follows.

What to do if you’re stuck

If you’ve read this far and the resistance you’re feeling is yes, but how do I actually do all of this without losing my pipeline, that is the right question.

The answer is: not in one move.

Position first. Then move one or two of the five shifts above. Watch what happens. Adjust. Keep going.

The designers who do this in our program don’t make all five shifts on day one. They make them over the course of the program, with feedback and accountability and the framework on the wall.

If that’s the shape of work you want, The Brand Lab is the program. Five spots a month. We help you do exactly this kind of move with a real strategy underneath it.

Book a Brand Strategy Call. 30 minutes, no pitch. If we’re not a fit, we’ll tell you.

Frequently asked

How much should an interior designer charge?

There is no universal right answer, because what you should charge depends on your positioning, your market, your project type, and the specific client you serve best. Generally, designers who command premium fees charge a flat project fee or a percentage of the project total (commonly 20 to 35 percent), not hourly rates. Hourly rates create a ceiling on what clients will pay for your time. Flat fees and percentages let you be paid for the value of the outcome, not the cost of the hours.

Why do clients keep negotiating my interior design fees?

Clients negotiate when they don't see what makes you different from the next designer. Negotiation is what happens when the only legible variable is price. The fastest way to stop the negotiation isn't a better script for the call. It's positioning so clear that the prospect arrives understanding why your number is what it is, before the call happens.

Should interior designers charge hourly or flat fee?

Flat fees almost always serve the designer better, especially as your work matures. Hourly fees pay you for input. Flat fees pay you for outcome. Once you have positioning that justifies a premium fee, flat fees become both clearer for the client and more profitable for you. The transition is uncomfortable; the math works.

How do I raise my interior design rates without losing clients?

Raise rates and accept that you will lose some clients. That's a feature, not a bug. The clients who leave are the ones who were buying you on price, which means they would have left anyway the moment a cheaper option appeared. The clients who stay (and the new ones who arrive) are the ones who pay for value. The math nearly always works in favor of fewer, better-fit clients at higher fees. Most designers we work with end up with more revenue, fewer projects, and shorter sales cycles within 6 to 12 months.
Field notes

Long-form thinking, every week.

Positioning, pricing, and brand strategy for interior designers. From the studio that runs The Brand Lab. Unsubscribe anytime.